Last updated: 2018-07-17

workflowr checks: (Click a bullet for more information)
  • R Markdown file: up-to-date

    Great! Since the R Markdown file has been committed to the Git repository, you know the exact version of the code that produced these results.

  • Environment: empty

    Great job! The global environment was empty. Objects defined in the global environment can affect the analysis in your R Markdown file in unknown ways. For reproduciblity it’s best to always run the code in an empty environment.

  • Seed: set.seed(20180714)

    The command set.seed(20180714) was run prior to running the code in the R Markdown file. Setting a seed ensures that any results that rely on randomness, e.g. subsampling or permutations, are reproducible.

  • Session information: recorded

    Great job! Recording the operating system, R version, and package versions is critical for reproducibility.

  • Repository version: a0bccf9

    Great! You are using Git for version control. Tracking code development and connecting the code version to the results is critical for reproducibility. The version displayed above was the version of the Git repository at the time these results were generated.

    Note that you need to be careful to ensure that all relevant files for the analysis have been committed to Git prior to generating the results (you can use wflow_publish or wflow_git_commit). workflowr only checks the R Markdown file, but you know if there are other scripts or data files that it depends on. Below is the status of the Git repository when the results were generated:
    
    Ignored files:
        Ignored:    .DS_Store
        Ignored:    .Rhistory
        Ignored:    .Rproj.user/
        Ignored:    docs/.DS_Store
        Ignored:    docs/figure/.DS_Store
    
    
    Note that any generated files, e.g. HTML, png, CSS, etc., are not included in this status report because it is ok for generated content to have uncommitted changes.
Expand here to see past versions:
    File Version Author Date Message
    Rmd a0bccf9 Jason Willwerscheid 2018-07-17 wflow_publish(“analysis/obj_notes.Rmd”)


Indirect method

Recall the FLASH model: \[ Y = LF' + E \]

When updating loading \(l_k\), we are optimizing over \(g_{l_k}\) and \(q_{l_k}\). \(g_{l_k} \in \mathcal{G}\) is the prior on the elements of the \(k\)th column of the loadings matrix: \[ l_{1k}, \ldots, l_{nk} \sim^{iid} g_{l_k} \] \(q_{l_k}\) is an arbitrary distribution which enters the problem via the variational approach. For convenience, I drop the subscripts in the following.

The part of the objective that depends on \(g\) and \(q\) is \[ F(g, q) := E_q \left[ -\frac{1}{2} \sum_i (A_i l_i^2 - 2 B_i l_i) \right] + E_q \log \frac{g(\mathbf{l})}{q(\mathbf{l})} \] with \[ A_i = \sum_j \tau_{ij} Ef^2_j \text{ and } B_i = \sum_j \tau_{ij} R_{ij} Ef_j, \] (\(R\) is the matrix of residuals (excluding factor \(k\)) and \(EF_j\) and \(EF^2_j\) are the expected values of \(f_jk\) and \(f_jk^2\) with respect to the distribution \(q_{f_k}\) fitted during the factor update.)

As Lemma 2 in the paper shows (see Appendix A.2), this expression is optimized by setting \(s_j^2 = A_j\) and \(x_j = B_j s_j^2\), and then solving the EBNM problem, where the EBNM model is: \[ \mathbf{x} = \mathbf{\theta} + \mathbf{e},\ \theta_1, \ldots, \theta_n \sim^{iid} g \]

Solving the EBNM problem gives \[\hat{g} = {\arg \max}_g\ p(x \mid g) \] and \[ \hat{q} = p(\theta \mid x, \hat{g}) \]

Finally, to update the overall objective, we need to compute \(E_q \log \frac{g(\mathbf{l})}{q(\mathbf{l})}\). FLASH uses a clever trick, noticing that \[ E_{\hat{q}} \log \frac{\hat{g}(\mathbf{l})}{\hat{q}(\mathbf{l})} = F(\hat{g}, \hat{q}) + \frac{1}{2} E_{\hat{q}} \left[ \sum_j \log 2\pi s_j^2 + (1/s+j^2)(x_j - \theta_j)^2 \right]\] (See Appendix A.4.)

Direct method

When using ebnm_pn, however, it seems possible to compute \(E_q \log \frac{g(\mathbf{l})}{q(\mathbf{l})}\) directly. Since the elements \(l_1, \ldots, l_n\) are i.i.d. from \(g\) (by the FLASH model) and the posterior distributions are mutually independent (by the EBNM model), \[ E_q \log \frac{g(\mathbf{l})}{q(\mathbf{l})} = \sum_j E_{q_j} \log \frac{g(l_j)}{q(l_j)} \]

I drop the subscripts \(j\). Write \[ g \sim \pi_0 \delta_0 + (1 - \pi_0) N(0, 1/a) \] and \[ q \sim \tilde{\pi}_0 \delta_0 + (1 - \tilde{\pi}_0) N(\tilde{\mu}, \tilde{\sigma}^2) \] (I parametrize the normals differently to follow the code more closely.)

Then \[\begin{aligned} E_q \log \frac{g(l)}{q(l)} &= \tilde{\pi_0} \log \frac{\pi_0}{\tilde{\pi}_0} + \int (1 - \tilde{\pi}_0) \text{dnorm}(x; \tilde{\mu}, \tilde{\sigma}^2) \log \frac{(1 - \pi_0)\text{dnorm}(x; 0, 1/a)} {(1 - \tilde{\pi}_0)\text{dnorm}(x; \tilde{\mu}, \tilde{\sigma}^2)}\ dx \\ &= \tilde{\pi_0} \log \frac{\pi_0}{\tilde{\pi}_0} + (1 - \tilde{\pi_0}) \log \frac{1 - \pi_0}{1 - \tilde{\pi}_0} \\ &\ + \int (1 - \tilde{\pi}_0) \text{dnorm}(x; \tilde{\mu}, \tilde{\sigma}^2) \log \left( \sqrt{a \tilde{\sigma}^2} \exp \left( -\frac{ax^2}{2} + \frac{(x - \tilde{\mu})^2}{2 \tilde{\sigma}^2} \right) \right) \ dx \\ &= \tilde{\pi_0} \log \frac{\pi_0}{\tilde{\pi}_0} + (1 - \tilde{\pi_0}) \log \frac{1 - \pi_0}{1 - \tilde{\pi}_0} + \frac{1 - \tilde{\pi_0}}{2} \log (a \tilde{\sigma}^2) \\ &\ - \frac{(1 - \tilde{\pi}_0)a}{2} E_{N(x; \tilde{\mu}, \tilde{\sigma}^2)} x^2 + \frac{1 - \tilde{\pi}_0}{2 \tilde{\sigma}^2} E_{N(x; \tilde{\mu}, \tilde{\sigma}^2)} (x - \tilde{\mu})^2 \\ &= \tilde{\pi_0} \log \frac{\pi_0}{\tilde{\pi}_0} + (1 - \tilde{\pi_0}) \log \frac{1 - \pi_0}{1 - \tilde{\pi}_0} + \frac{1 - \tilde{\pi_0}}{2} \log (a \tilde{\sigma}^2) - \frac{(1 - \tilde{\pi}_0)a}{2} (\tilde{\mu}^2 + \tilde{\sigma}^2) + \frac{1 - \tilde{\pi}_0}{2} \end{aligned}\]

So we should be able to calculate $E_q} as follows:

calc_KL <- function(x, s, g) {
  pi0 <- g$pi0
  w <- 1 - g$pi0
  a <- g$a
  
  wpost <- ebnm:::wpost_normal(x, s, w, a) # 1 - \tilde{\pi}_0
  pi0post <- 1 - wpost[wpost < 1] # \tilde{\pi}_0
  pmean_cond <- ebnm:::pmean_cond_normal(x, s, a) # \tilde{\mu}
  pvar_cond <- ebnm:::pvar_cond_normal(s, a) # \tilde{\sigma}^2

  KLa <- pi0post * log(pi0 / pi0post)
  KLb <- wpost * log(w / wpost)
  KLc <- (wpost / 2) * log(a * pvar_cond)
  KLd <- -(wpost / 2) * a * (pvar_cond + pmean_cond^2)
  KLe <- (wpost / 2)
  sum(KLa) + sum(KLb) + sum(KLc) + sum(KLd) + sum(KLe)
}

Session information

sessionInfo()
R version 3.4.3 (2017-11-30)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0 (64-bit)
Running under: macOS Sierra 10.12.6

Matrix products: default
BLAS: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRblas.0.dylib
LAPACK: /Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Versions/3.4/Resources/lib/libRlapack.dylib

locale:
[1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8

attached base packages:
[1] stats     graphics  grDevices utils     datasets  methods   base     

loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
 [1] workflowr_1.0.1   Rcpp_0.12.17      digest_0.6.15    
 [4] rprojroot_1.3-2   R.methodsS3_1.7.1 backports_1.1.2  
 [7] git2r_0.21.0      magrittr_1.5      evaluate_0.10.1  
[10] stringi_1.1.6     whisker_0.3-2     R.oo_1.21.0      
[13] R.utils_2.6.0     rmarkdown_1.8     tools_3.4.3      
[16] stringr_1.3.0     yaml_2.1.17       compiler_3.4.3   
[19] htmltools_0.3.6   knitr_1.20       

This reproducible R Markdown analysis was created with workflowr 1.0.1